Sarah is taking her Business Ethics oral exam
The AI examiner will assess her understanding while maintaining educational integrity through constitutional oversight (Five Yamas framework).
The examiner poses a stakeholder theory question
Sarah, let's discuss stakeholder theory. Can you explain how Freeman's framework applies to a company facing environmental criticism?
Sarah demonstrates her understanding
Freeman's stakeholder theory suggests that companies have obligations beyond just shareholders. In an environmental case, stakeholders would include the local community affected by pollution, environmental advocacy groups, employees concerned about the company's reputation, customers making ethical purchasing decisions, and future generations. The company needs to balance all these interests, not just maximize profit for shareholders. For example, if a mining company faces criticism for water contamination, Freeman's framework would require them to engage with affected communities, invest in environmental remediation, and potentially change operations even if it reduces short-term profits.
AI evaluates response for accuracy, depth, and original thinking
The AI adapts to Sarah's specific response
Good foundation, Sarah. Now, how might Friedman critics respond to your stakeholder approach? Where are the tensions between maximizing shareholder value and serving multiple stakeholders?
Constitutional Filtering in Action: The AI detected that Sarah's answer was strong but lacked dialectical tension. Rather than accepting a surface-level response, it pushes for deeper engagement with opposing viewpoints — a core principle of Socratic examination and the Satya (truthfulness) yama.
Final grade with detailed feedback
Human examiners are inconsistent. AI doesn't have to be.
Every question, every score, every decision — auditable
Generates questions, provides answers. No Socratic depth. No constitutional scoring. No consistency guarantee. No audit trail. The student gets help — but is it fair?
Socratic examination with constitutional oversight. Asteya ensures grades are earned. Satya ensures accuracy. Every decision is auditable. Appeals have evidence.
ChatGPT = Answers. Axiom = Assessment.
IOaaS proves that AI assessment can be fairer than human assessment — consistent, constitutional, and fully auditable. Every grade has a provenance chain. Every decision can be appealed with evidence.
Try IOaaS →