A founder seeks the Council's wisdom
"Should we pivot from B2C to B2B? We have 6 months runway and 10K users but no revenue path. We're bleeding cash and investors are getting nervous. Do we abandon our consumer vision or double down?"
— Startup Founder, SaaS Company
The Strategic Commander analyzes battlefield conditions
The runway constraint is critical — 6 months is the killing ground. B2B typically has 6-12 month sales cycles. If we pivot fully to B2B now, we'll likely run out of runway before closing deals. But maintaining B2C with zero revenue path is equally fatal. I propose a hybrid maneuver: keep B2C for traction metrics while launching parallel B2B pilots. Use the 10K user base as social proof in B2B sales conversations. Deploy resources 70/30 — 70% to rapid B2B validation, 30% to maintaining B2C lighthouse accounts.
The Wisdom Keeper questions deeper assumptions
Before tactics, we must understand essence. What does the founder truly want? Rapid growth or sustainable business? Impact or exit? The 'pivot question' masks a deeper question about values and vision. I've seen founders chase B2B revenue while their hearts remain in consumer impact — this creates misalignment that poisons culture. Conversely, I've seen founders cling to B2C dreams while their business model screams for B2B. The question isn't where the market is — it's where the founder's authentic energy lives. A misaligned pivot succeeds financially but fails spiritually. An aligned one finds both.
The Socratic Examiner challenges assumptions
I must challenge the premise. Have we validated that B2B customers actually exist? What evidence supports the assumption that B2B is more viable than improving B2C monetization? The founder says 'no revenue path' for B2C — but have they tried premium tiers? Freemium conversion optimization? Usage-based pricing? Or are they assuming B2B is easier because everyone says so? I see founders flee to B2B as escapism from hard consumer monetization work. Before pivoting, prove the B2C model is fundamentally broken, not just under-optimized. Show me the failed experiments. Otherwise we're just fleeing one unvalidated hypothesis for another.
The Builder calculates implementation reality
Let's talk build requirements. B2B pivot needs: (1) Enterprise features — SSO, audit logs, admin dashboards, role-based access, (2) Sales infrastructure — CRM, demo environment, security questionnaire responses, SOC 2 compliance, (3) Customer success — onboarding flows, training materials, support SLAs. Conservatively: 8-12 weeks to minimum viable B2B offering. That's half the runway before we can even start selling. Plus: B2B has longer feedback loops. If we ship wrong features, we won't know for months. Can we compress the build? Yes — launch with 3-5 power users from existing B2C base, offer white-label or API access with minimal new features. Validate B2B demand before building full enterprise stack.
SOPHIA integrates the perspectives
"Preserving what negates while lifting..."
The Integrative Synthesizer reveals the path
SYNTHESIS: Don't pivot — EXPAND
The Council's wisdom converges on a path that preserves optionality while testing the B2B hypothesis:
The Aufhebung: This preserves what each perspective contributed while negating the false binary. It's not B2C or B2B — it's B2C with B2B expansion, validated before committed. The founder keeps their vision alive while testing revenue paths. 6 months runway becomes sufficient because we're learning fast, not building slow.
The synthesis is complete
ELENCHUS objects: "I want more evidence that B2C monetization was thoroughly tested before any B2B effort. The founder should spend 1 week optimizing B2C conversion before testing B2B. Otherwise we're just chasing shiny objects."
How 5 agents produce better decisions than 1
Every agent scored, every deliberation auditable
Agent teams = parallel task execution. Multiple AI assistants doing things simultaneously. Useful, but no governance layer.
Agent teams = dialectical reasoning architecture. Each agent has constitutional constraints. The conflict IS the product. Governance is built into the topology.
Microsoft = Agent Tasks. Axiom = Agent Wisdom.
Multi-perspective deliberation prevents binary thinking traps. Every agent is constitutionally scored, every deliberation is auditable, and the Aufhebung synthesis creates wisdom that single-agent AI cannot achieve.
Consult the Council →